Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 August 20233313016

Land at the rear of Avenue House , London Road, Latton Common , Harlow , CM17 9NJ

outline planning permission for the erection of 6 no. dwellings with access, parking and associated works

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bartlett R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness, together with moderate harm to character and appearance, is not clearly outweighed by other considerations including housing delivery and the effective use of a windfall site.

The other considerations weighing in favour of the development do not clearly outweigh the substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness, or the moderate harm to character and appearance, and therefore very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 149, 130, 57, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DM4, Policy H3, Policy DM5, Policy DM9, Policy SP3, Policy T1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.