Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 September 20233315469

Radcliffe Road , West Bridgford, Nottinghamshire , NG2 5DU

a 15.0m Phase 9 slimline monopole and associated ancillary works

Authority
Rushcliffe Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Change of use
Inspector
Watson S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the living conditions of the occupiers at Number 134 Rutland Road
  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on highway safety
  • Whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance caused by the mast's height, bulk and utilitarian design in a residential setting was not outweighed by the need for the installation at this location, as the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence that suitable alternative sites had been properly assessed and rejected.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: Policy 10 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy, Policy 1 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.