Planning appeal decision
Footway of Lapwing Lane, Didsbury, Manchester, M20 6UR
Planning appeal 3318357 at Footway of Lapwing Lane, Didsbury, Manchester, M20 6UR (Manchester City Council) was dismissed on 1 March 2024 by Inspector Pearce S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Ballbrook Conservation Area.
a “telecommunications mast and equipment/power cabinets, the installation of an 18.0m column supporting 6 no antennas, together with 2 no. ground-based equipment cabinets 1 no. power cabinet and ancillary development thereto
- Authority
- Manchester City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Pearce S
- Postcode
- M20 6UR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Ballbrook Conservation Area
- if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The siting and appearance of the proposed monopole would cause less than substantial harm to the significance of the Ballbrook Conservation Area that is not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of improved connectivity, particularly given that suitable alternative sites have not been properly explored.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- UDP Policy DC17.1UDP Policy DC18.1CS Policy DM1CS Policy EN3CS Policy SP1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 119Paragraph 121Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Manchester City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed14 October 20266013305Beech Court, Willow Bank, Manchester, M14 6XT
- Allowed8 October 20266011214Basement To First Floor,, 58 - 60 Portland Street,, Manchester,, M1 4QT
- Allowed6 October 20266009176571 Oldham Road, Manchester, M40 5AF
- Dismissed1 October 2026601402848 Topfield Road, Manchester, M22 9QN
- Dismissed1 October 2026600801865 Grimshaw Lane, Manchester, M40 2AX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®