Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 January 20243319979

Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire, EN7 5EL

Planning appeal 3319979 at Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire, EN7 5EL (Broxbourne Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 January 2024 by Inspector Gilbert-Wooldridge T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.

9 dwellings comprising 4no. 2 bed, 4no. 3 bed and 1no. 4 bed with associated access drive, parking, paths, landscaping and boundary gates and fences

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Gilbert-Wooldridge T
Postcode
EN7 5EL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on trees
  • whether harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and conflict with Green Belt purposes, to which substantial weight must be given, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery and affordable housing provision, even in the context of a shortfall in housing land supply.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, openness and countryside encroachment was not clearly outweighed by the significant weight given to housing delivery including affordable units and biodiversity net gain, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
BLP Policy GB1BLP Policy NEB5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 82Paragraph 136Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

91 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Broxbourne

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed12 October 20266008417
    Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, EN7 5EL
  2. Allowed10 June 20266003616
    Land at Goffs Oak Gospel Hall, East of Newgatestreet Road, Goffs Oak, EN7 5RU
  3. Dismissed4 November 20253366275
    Land to the West of Elm Farm Crouch Lane, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, Broxbourne, Hertfordshire, EN7 6TH
  4. Split Decision4 November 20253339195
    Flopsy Wood Community Project Cic, Cock Lane, Hoddesdon, EN11 8LS
  5. Allowed9 October 20253366662
    Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, EN7 5EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.