Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 April 20243321012

Land to the Rear of 7-8 Bruce Grove, London, N17 6RA

Planning appeal 3321012 at Land to the Rear of 7-8 Bruce Grove, London, N17 6RA (London Borough of Haringey) was allowed on 10 April 2024 by Inspector Livingstone C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development.

a residential development up to 9 dwellings with associated open space & landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Livingstone C
Postcode
N17 6RA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, combined with the material benefits of housing delivery, biodiversity net gain, and improved public open space, outweighed the conflicts with the development plan's open space and nature conservation policies.

The adverse impacts of the loss of designated open space and local SINC, and less-than-substantial harm to the listed building setting, were outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery (up to nine dwellings), biodiversity improvements, provision of publicly accessible open space, and economic and social benefits, applying the presumption in favour of sustainable development under NPPF paragraph 11(d) due to the lack of five-year housing land supply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP13 of Haringey's Local Plan Strategic Policies 2013-2026Policy DM20 of the Development Management DPD 2017Policy DM19 of the Development Management DPD 2017Policy G4 of the London PlanPolicy HC1 of the London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

465 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.