Planning appeal decision
Land at Shudehill, Manchester, M4 2AD
Planning appeal 3322178 at Land at Shudehill, Manchester, M4 2AD (Manchester City Council) was dismissed on 10 November 2023 by Inspector Nicholson D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the design of its: siting, scale, size, height, massing, architectural detailing, street scene and skyline.
Demolition of all non-listed buildings, partial demolition and alterations to 29 Shudehill, and erection of a new building comprising ground floor plus part 1, part 6, part 7, and part 18 storeys to include residential units (Use Class C3) together with flexible ground floor commercial floorspace (Use Class E), new public realm, cycle parking, and other associated work. Appeal B: APP/B4215/Y/23/3322180
- Authority
- Manchester City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Nicholson D
- Postcode
- M4 2AD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the design of its: siting, scale, size, height, massing, architectural detailing, street scene and skyline
- the effect of the proposals on the significance of heritage assets including that derived from their settings, with particular regard to the partial loss of the Grade II listed No.29 Shudehill, the Shudehill Conservation Area, the loss of most of the non-designated Rosenfield Buildings, and the settings of other listed buildings and conservation areas
- whether the heritage and public benefits would outweigh any harm that might be identified in reaching any heritage balances and, if so, whether the same benefits could be achieved with less harm
- the extent to which the proposals would be consistent with Government policies and with the development plan for the area in reaching the overall planning balance
What decided it
The considerable harm to the character and appearance of the area combined with heritage harm to the listed building, non-designated Rosenfield Buildings and Conservation Area was found to overwhelmingly outweigh the public benefits of the scheme.
the limited weight given to heritage benefits and the moderate or lower weight given to the other public benefits did not outweigh the combined harm to the listed building, the non-designated heritage assets and the Conservation Area, so the balance tipped decisively against the scheme
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP1Policy EC3Policy CC1Policy CC2Policy CC3Policy H1Policy CC6Policy CC7Policy CC8Policy CC10Policy EN2Policy CC9Policy EN1Policy EN3Policy DM1Policy DC18Policy DC19Policy H8PfE JP-P1PfE JP-P2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 60Paragraph 120Paragraph 110Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 203
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Manchester City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed14 October 20266013305Beech Court, Willow Bank, Manchester, M14 6XT
- Allowed8 October 20266011214Basement To First Floor,, 58 - 60 Portland Street,, Manchester,, M1 4QT
- Allowed6 October 20266009176571 Oldham Road, Manchester, M40 5AF
- Dismissed1 October 2026601402848 Topfield Road, Manchester, M22 9QN
- Dismissed1 October 2026600801865 Grimshaw Lane, Manchester, M40 2AX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®