Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 January 20243323902

93 Applesham Avenue, Hove, BN3 8JN

Planning appeal 3323902 at 93 Applesham Avenue, Hove, BN3 8JN (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 31 January 2024 by Inspector Pearce J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect on the character and appearance of the area.

the conversion of detached annexe to one bedroom dwelling (C3) including the demolition of an existing garage

Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pearce J
Postcode
BN3 8JN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect on the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring properties, with regard to the privacy and outlook of Numbers 91-95 Applesham Avenue

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance and to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, when weighed against the limited housing benefits of a single dwelling, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance and significant harm to living conditions of neighbouring occupants significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits of a single dwelling to housing supply when assessed against the policies of the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SA6Policy CP12Policy CP14Policy DM18Policy DM19Policy DM20Policy DM21
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

193 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed26 October 20266014224
    East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
  2. Dismissed6 October 20266011541
    16 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266007266
    23-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
  4. Dismissed26 August 20266009586
    10 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
  5. Notice varied and upheld12 August 20263356977
    8 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.