Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 April 20243324349

Camps Farm , Hoe Lane, Nr Waltham Abbey, Essex, EN9 2RG

Planning appeal 3324349 at Camps Farm , Hoe Lane, Nr Waltham Abbey, Essex, EN9 2RG (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 10 April 2024 by Inspector Moulton E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

the demolition of all existing structures and redevelopment with 1 x 3 bedroom single storey dwelling (Plot A) and 1 x 4 bedroom single storey dwelling (Plot B) together with landscaping, a drainage strategy and arrangements for access and parking

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Moulton E
Postcode
EN9 2RG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of nearby Grade II listed buildings, Camps Farmhouse (the White House), Camps, Barn at rear of Camps (Camps barn) and Parkers, and Grade II* listed buildings, Greenleaves and Barn 20m south of Greenleaves (Greenleaves barn)
  • The extent to which the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Nazeing and South Roydon Conservation Area (CA), and the effect of the proposal on Camps Grange, a non-designated heritage asset
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness in the Green Belt, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt by definition harmful, and the limited benefits from housing delivery, economic activity, and heritage preservation do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of housing supply, economic and social benefits from construction and occupation, moderate benefits from removal of derelict buildings and reduction in building volume, and moderate benefits from reduction in commercial traffic and potential drainage improvements.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy E1 of the Epping Forest District Local Plan 2011-2033 Part One
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

120 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  2. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266008699
    Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
  4. Dismissed23 October 20266013055
    Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
  5. Dismissed21 October 20266010759
    Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.