Planning appeal decision
Camps Farm , Hoe Lane, Nr Waltham Abbey, Essex, EN9 2RG
Planning appeal 3324349 at Camps Farm , Hoe Lane, Nr Waltham Abbey, Essex, EN9 2RG (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 10 April 2024 by Inspector Moulton E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the demolition of all existing structures and redevelopment with 1 x 3 bedroom single storey dwelling (Plot A) and 1 x 4 bedroom single storey dwelling (Plot B) together with landscaping, a drainage strategy and arrangements for access and parking
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Moulton E
- Postcode
- EN9 2RG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of nearby Grade II listed buildings, Camps Farmhouse (the White House), Camps, Barn at rear of Camps (Camps barn) and Parkers, and Grade II* listed buildings, Greenleaves and Barn 20m south of Greenleaves (Greenleaves barn)
- The extent to which the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Nazeing and South Roydon Conservation Area (CA), and the effect of the proposal on Camps Grange, a non-designated heritage asset
- Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness in the Green Belt, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt by definition harmful, and the limited benefits from housing delivery, economic activity, and heritage preservation do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of housing supply, economic and social benefits from construction and occupation, moderate benefits from removal of derelict buildings and reduction in building volume, and moderate benefits from reduction in commercial traffic and potential drainage improvements.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy E1 of the Epping Forest District Local Plan 2011-2033 Part One
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®