Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld7 March 20243329327

Messengers Nursery , Nursery Road , WALTHAM ABBEY, EN9 2JF

Without planning permission:- Change of use of the yard area to a mixed use comprising storage and distribution of shelving and racking, stationing of portable buildings and containers, storage and parking of non-agricultural commercial vehicles, storage of non-agricultural equipment and vehicles, and erection of a storage building for non-agricultural purposes to facilitate use

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Perkins L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether it was too late for the Council to take enforcement action due to the time limits set out in section 171B of the 1990 Act, ie the ground (d) appeal
  • if the above ground of appeal is not successful, whether planning permission ought to be granted for the breach of planning control alleged, ie the ground (a) appeal
  • whether the period for compliance with the notice falls short of what should reasonably be allowed, ie the ground (g) appeal
  • whether the appeal development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the appeal development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise
  • if the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the appeal development

What decided it

The Green Belt harm from inappropriate development and loss of openness, combined with harm to neighbours' living conditions from noise, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist to justify the development.

the harm from inappropriateness, loss of openness and harm to living conditions from noise was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations (economic benefits, fallback positions, comparator permissions), so very special circumstances did not exist and the balance tipped against the development

Framework references: 155, 154, 85, 56

Plan policies cited: Policy SP5, Policy DM3, Policy DM4, Policy DM9, Policy DM21, Policy E1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.