Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 April 20243332604

Fancy Free, 67, Hoe Lane, Lambourne, Romford, Essex, RM4 1AU

addition of second floor, new roof structure with dormers towards rear of the property. Simultaneous application also submitted for ground floor extension

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bell-Williamson J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed roof extension would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area
  • the effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 65 Hoe Lane, with regard to outlook
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt with moderate harm to openness, and no very special circumstances exist to justify it.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy DM4, Policy DM9, Policy DM10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.