Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 October 20243333756

665 High Road, Tottenham, London, N17 8AD

Planning appeal 3333756 at 665 High Road, Tottenham, London, N17 8AD (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 23 October 2024 by Inspector Jarvis P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the host building, a locally listed building (LLB), and wider area including the North Tottenham Conservation Area (CA).

erection of rear double storey extension on first and second floor to accommodate two 2 bed 3 person flats with associated amenities and facilities, refuse storage and bicycle parking. 1. The appeal is dismissed

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jarvis P
Postcode
N17 8AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the host building, a locally listed building (LLB), and wider area including the North Tottenham Conservation Area (CA)
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of the proposed flats and of neighbouring properties

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the locally listed building and the North Tottenham Conservation Area, which provides a clear reason for refusal that displaces the presumption in favour of granting permission under Framework paragraph 11(d)(i).

The benefits of the proposal in contributing to local housing supply, particularly smaller units, and economic and social benefits were insufficient to outweigh the significant harm to heritage assets and the conflict with the development plan

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SP2SP11SP12DM1DM9DM11DM12D3D6HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 208Paragraph 209

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

473 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.