Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Harlow Road, Near Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5QF
Planning appeal 3334690 at Land Adjacent to Harlow Road, Near Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5QF (Epping Forest District Council) was allowed on 3 May 2024 by Inspector Shrigley M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the development on the Green Belt having regard to its openness and purpose.
Construction and operation of a solar photovoltaic ('PV') farm and associated infrastructure, including inverters, DNO substation, customer switchgear, security cameras, fencing, access tracks and landscaping
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- utilities-energy · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Shrigley M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the development on the Green Belt having regard to its openness and purpose
- The loss of farmland for food production
- The overall scheme merits applicable including whether the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it, as well as recognition of all harms and benefits in the planning balance
What decided it
The substantial benefits of clean, secure renewable energy generation were found to constitute very special circumstances clearly outweighing the moderate Green Belt harm.
The combined scheme benefits, particularly the clean and secure renewable energy generation, biodiversity net gain and landscaping legacy, were found to amount to very special circumstances that clearly outweighed the moderate Green Belt harm, the limited farmland/food production harm, the less than substantial heritage harm, and other identified harms, so the appeal was allowed despite conflict with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP5Policy DM4Policy DM20Policy DM5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 138Paragraph 153Paragraph 180Paragraph 181Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery) v North Yorkshire County Council 2020
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®