Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 May 20243334690

Land Adjacent to Harlow Road, Near Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5QF

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
utilities-energy · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Shrigley M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the development on the Green Belt having regard to its openness and purpose
  • The loss of farmland for food production
  • The overall scheme merits applicable including whether the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it, as well as recognition of all harms and benefits in the planning balance

What decided it

The substantial benefits of clean, secure renewable energy generation were found to constitute very special circumstances clearly outweighing the moderate Green Belt harm.

The combined scheme benefits, particularly the clean and secure renewable energy generation, biodiversity net gain and landscaping legacy, were found to amount to very special circumstances that clearly outweighed the moderate Green Belt harm, the limited farmland/food production harm, the less than substantial heritage harm, and other identified harms, so the appeal was allowed despite conflict with the development plan.

Framework references: 142, 138, 153, 180, 181, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy SP5, Policy DM4, Policy DM20, Policy DM5

Judgments cited: R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery) v North Yorkshire County Council 2020

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.