Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 July 20243334815

Land Behind 21 Main St, Gypsy Rose Cottage, Bradmore, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG11 6PB

Planning appeal 3334815 at Land Behind 21 Main St, Gypsy Rose Cottage, Bradmore, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG11 6PB (Rushcliffe Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 July 2024 by Inspector Gilbert-Wooldridge T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the significance of Bradmore Conservation Area.

change of use to allow temporary static caravan and associated works

Authority
Rushcliffe Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Gilbert-Wooldridge T
Postcode
NG11 6PB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the significance of Bradmore Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties
  • whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location having regard to the development plan

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area, combined with significant adverse effects on living conditions and conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy, could not be outweighed by any public benefits or the appellant's personal circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LPP1 Policy 3LPP1 Policy 10LPP2 Policy 1LPP2 Policy 11LPP2 Policy 28
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12Paragraph 16Paragraph 135Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rushcliffe

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed6 October 20266002873
    Land At Main Street, Flintham, NG23 5LA
  2. Allowed2 October 20266010392
    144 Browns Lane, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5BN
  3. Dismissed27 August 20266010993
    9 Birkin Avenue, Ruddington, Nottingham, NG11 6BJ
  4. Dismissed11 August 20266010159
    Land Field To The South Of Belvoir Vue, Sutton Lane, Granby, NG13 9PY
  5. Dismissed2 July 20266004512
    Garden Land to the Rear (North-East) of Olivants Cottage, Burton Lane, Whatton, NG13 9EQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.