Planning appeal decision
11C Montpelier Villas, Brighton, BN1 3DG
Planning appeal 3340013 at 11C Montpelier Villas, Brighton, BN1 3DG (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 5 July 2024 by Inspector James A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, known as 'Numbers 11 and 12 and attached railings and piers' (Ref: 1380094) (Nos 11 & 12), and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.
erection of single storey side extension at first floor level. Appeal B: APP/Q1445/Y/24/3340013 The Garden Villa, 11C Montpelier Villas, Brighton BN1 3DG
- Authority
- Brighton and Hove City Council
- Appeal type
- other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- James A
- Postcode
- BN1 3DG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, known as 'Numbers 11 and 12 and attached railings and piers' (Ref: 1380094) (Nos 11 & 12), and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
- whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, known as 'Numbers 70-74 and attached railings' (Ref: 1381585) (Nos 70-74)
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, having particular regard to the Montpelier and Clifton Hill Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposed extension on the living conditions of the occupants of 71 and 72 Montpelier Road (Nos 71 & 72), with particular reference to enclosure
What decided it
The proposal would fail to preserve the special interest of the Grade II listed building, the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, and the character and appearance of the Conservation Area, with insufficient public benefits to outweigh the less than substantial but considerable harm identified.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP15Policy DM26Policy DM27Policy DM20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208Paragraph 203
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed26 October 20266014224East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
- Dismissed6 October 2026601154116 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
- Dismissed15 September 2026600726623-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
- Dismissed26 August 2026600958610 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
- Notice varied and upheld12 August 202633569778 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®