Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 November 20243340205

Bramleys Foster Street, Harlow, CM17 9HS

Planning appeal 3340205 at Bramleys Foster Street, Harlow, CM17 9HS (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 14 November 2024 by Inspector Manchester S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

new dormer bungalow utilising existing dedicated access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Manchester S
Postcode
CM17 9HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, as the harm to openness and character and appearance was not outweighed by any other material considerations.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with moderate harm to character and appearance, was not outweighed by limited benefits including negligible housing contribution, limited economic benefits, and limited weight to personal circumstances and fallback position.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM4Policy SP5Policy DM9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 154Paragraph 8
Judgments
Vision Engineering Ltd v SoS and Guildford Borough Council

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

43 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  2. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266008699
    Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
  4. Dismissed23 October 20266013055
    Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
  5. Dismissed21 October 20266010759
    Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.