Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed7 August 20243341662

74 Turnpike Lane, London, N8 0PR

Planning appeal 3341662 at 74 Turnpike Lane, London, N8 0PR (London Borough of Haringey) was allowed on 7 August 2024 by Inspector Rafiq F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers with regard to daylight, sunlight and outlook.

to remove ground floor temporary structure; construct 3 storey rear extension to extend kitchen for existing restaurant (ground floor) and facilitate change of use from HMO bedrooms (Use Class C4) into Class C3 dwellings comprising 1 no. two bed unit (first floor) and 2 no. one bed units (second floor & third floor), install replacement ventilation equipment & external flue to the rear

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Rafiq F
Postcode
N8 0PR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers with regard to daylight, sunlight and outlook
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory accommodation for its future occupants, with regard to internal space standards and private amenity space provision

What decided it

The proposal would not result in unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions and would provide satisfactory accommodation for future occupants in accordance with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1Policy D6Policy SP2Policy SP11Policy DM11Policy DM12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

478 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.