Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed11 November 20243342224

Land to the South & East of the Former Chimes Garden Centre, & Rear of 95 Old Nazeing Road, Walhtam Abbey, EN10 6RJ

Planning appeal 3342224 at Land to the South & East of the Former Chimes Garden Centre, & Rear of 95 Old Nazeing Road, Walhtam Abbey, EN10 6RJ (Epping Forest District Council) was allowed on 11 November 2024 by Inspector Dade E, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policies.

Redevelopment of the site to provide up to 52 later living apartments (Extra Care Housing) incorporating a convenience shop and café (use class E); 13 retirement cottages (Extra Care Housing); 10 self-build & custom build houses; 4 affordable houses, open space, bowling green, children's play area and improved local bus service; all matters reserved except access

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Dade E
Postcode
EN10 6RJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the proposal would provide an appropriate mix of housing, with particular regard to the provision of affordable housing
  • Whether the proposed development would make suitable provision for local community facilities
  • Whether the proposed development would achieve Biodiversity Net Gain
  • The effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative weight of significant benefits—housing supply, affordable housing, older people's housing and self-build provision—clearly outweighed the substantial Green Belt harm, establishing very special circumstances.

the substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriateness and loss of openness was clearly outweighed by the cumulative significant, modest and limited benefits (housing supply, affordable housing, older people's housing, self-build provision and other considerations), amounting to very special circumstances justifying the development

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP5Policy DM4Policy H2Policy D1Policy D2Policy D3Policy D4Policy DM1Policy DM2Policy DM22Policy DM3Policy DM5Policy DM9Policy DM11Policy DM15Policy DM16Policy DM18Policy DM19Policy DM21Policy T1Policy D5Policy H1Policy LP9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 54Paragraph 55Paragraph 57Paragraph 60Paragraph 66Paragraph 76Paragraph 142Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 185Paragraph 190

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

104 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  2. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266008699
    Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
  4. Dismissed23 October 20266013055
    Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
  5. Dismissed21 October 20266010759
    Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.