Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed30 August 20243342459

2 Courtland Drive, Chigwell, Essex, IG7 6PN

Planning appeal 3342459 at 2 Courtland Drive, Chigwell, Essex, IG7 6PN (Epping Forest District Council) was allowed on 30 August 2024 by Inspector Jones H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of existing dwelling and replacement with two structures containing a total of 5 new dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones H
Postcode
IG7 6PN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • The provision made for energy efficiency, low carbon and renewable energy measures within the proposed development
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the integrity of the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The unilateral undertaking securing financial contributions towards SAC mitigation removed the risk of an adverse effect on the integrity of the Epping Forest SAC, enabling overall compliance with the development plan.

minor conflict with Policy DM20 was outweighed by compliance with the other development plan policies, so the proposal accorded with the development plan taken as a whole and there were no material considerations to indicate a decision otherwise

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM9Policy DM20Policy T1Policy DM1Policy DM2Policy DM22Policy SP6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 164Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

151 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed26 August 20266008532
    The Chequers Public House, Matching Green, Harlow, CM17 0PZ
  2. Allowed12 August 20266004590
    8 Ollards Grove, Loughton, IG10 4DW
  3. Allowed10 August 20266007802
    Land at Marles Stud, Epping Road, Epping Upland, Epping, CM16 6PF
  4. Allowed10 August 20266007798
    Land at Marles Stud, Epping Road, Epping Upland, Epping, CM16 6PF
  5. Allowed10 July 20266002613
    39, Dukes Avenue, Theydon Bois, CM16 7HG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.