Planning appeal decision
Princess Elizabeth House (Aka Princess Elizabeth Court), 18 Winchester Place, Hornsey, London, N6 5BQ
Planning appeal 3343838 at Princess Elizabeth House (Aka Princess Elizabeth Court), 18 Winchester Place, Hornsey, London, N6 5BQ (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 9 January 2025 by Inspector Scott A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, described as 'Elizabeth House', and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.
the ‘installation of PV solar panels to different elements of building roof’. Appeal B: APP/Y5420/Y/24/3343833 Princess Elizabeth Court, Winchester Place, Hornsey, Haringey, London N6 5BQ
- Authority
- London Borough of Haringey
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- utilities-energy · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Scott A
- Postcode
- N6 5BQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, described as 'Elizabeth House', and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
- Whether the proposal would preserve a setting, as it relates to the special interest of the nearby Grade I listed building, Cromwell House
- The extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Highgate Conservation Area
What decided it
The degree of harm to the special interest of the listed building and significance of the conservation area caused by the visually prominent and materially incongruous solar panels was not outweighed by the public benefits of energy efficiency, particularly given the absence of evidence that the scheme was necessary to secure the building's viable use or that less harmful alternatives had been adequately explored.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- HC1SP12DM1DM9DH2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 201Paragraph 212Paragraph 215Paragraph 164
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Haringey
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed14 October 202660082516 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
- Allowed13 October 20266010745Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
- Dismissed13 October 2026600719538 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
- Dismissed9 October 202660113325 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
- Dismissed30 September 20263367051109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®