®Planning appeal decision
5A Wyndham Street, Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 1AF
Planning appeal 3344578 at 5A Wyndham Street, Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 1AF (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 16 October 2024 by Inspector O'Brien L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; including whether or not the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the East Cliff Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of the locally listed building.
erection of an additional storey to provide a self-contained one bedroom flat (C3)
- Authority
- Brighton and Hove City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Brien L
- Postcode
- BN2 1AF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; including whether or not the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the East Cliff Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of the locally listed building
- whether or not the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to space
What decided it
The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the significance of designated and locally listed heritage assets, and this harm was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme, particularly the addition of a single small flat that would also fail to meet space standards.
The limited benefits of housing supply and economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and locally listed building and the failure to provide satisfactory living conditions.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP12Policy CP15Policy DM21Policy DM26Policy DM28Policy DM1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed26 October 20266014224East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
- Dismissed6 October 2026601154116 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
- Dismissed15 September 2026600726623-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
- Dismissed26 August 2026600958610 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
- Notice varied and upheld12 August 202633569778 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.