Planning appeal decision
The Manor Hotel & Restaurant, Berwick Pond Road, Rainham, RM13 9EL
Planning appeal 3345306 at The Manor Hotel & Restaurant, Berwick Pond Road, Rainham, RM13 9EL (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 10 January 2025 by Inspector Bowyer J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the special interest of the Grade II listed building, 'Berwick Manor Country Club', its setting or any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.
‘change of use from hotel with associated F&B to create 9 total dwellings. 8 dwellings by way of internal alterations to existing manor building and 1 dwelling by way of rebuilding of adjacent dilapidated coach house. Associated landscaping works’
- Authority
- London Borough of Havering
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Bowyer J
- Postcode
- RM13 9EL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the special interest of the Grade II listed building, 'Berwick Manor Country Club', its setting or any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
- Whether living conditions for future occupiers of The Manor would be acceptable with regard to aspect and the provision of external amenity space
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The less-than-substantial harm to the special interest and significance of the Grade II listed building, when weighed against the public benefits of the proposal (housing delivery and environmental improvements), was found to be insufficient to justify the development, particularly as there was no compelling evidence that the delivery of dwellings was dependent on the scale, design and internal layout proposed.
The less-than-substantial harm to the listed building's significance, carrying considerable importance and weight, was not outweighed by the public benefits of housing delivery (significant weight but limited contribution given small scale), environmental and sustainability benefits (moderate weight), and other benefits; the presumption in favour of sustainable development at paragraph 11(d) did not apply because policies protecting designated heritage assets provided a strong reason for refusal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2 of the London Plan 2021Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021Policy H1 of the London Plan 2021Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 28 of the Havering Local Plan 2021
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 16Paragraph 66
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Havering
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Notice upheld25 June 20263358682Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
- Split Decision23 June 20263377437Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD
- Split Decision23 June 20263377383Noak Hill, Romford, RM4 1LD
- Allowed10 April 20266001332Bush Farm Back Lakes, Aveley Road, Upminster, RM14 2TQ
- Allowed26 February 20266001099Havering Park Stables, Bower Farm Road, Havering-Atte-Bower, Romford, Greater London, RM4 1QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®