Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 February 20253347150

The Bungalow, Paynes Lane, Nazeing, Waltham Abbey, EN9 2EZ

Planning appeal 3347150 at The Bungalow, Paynes Lane, Nazeing, Waltham Abbey, EN9 2EZ (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 14 February 2025 by Inspector Grierson E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on flood risk.

the conversion of existing garage into 4 bedroom bungalow involving rear extension and loft conversion

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Grierson E
Postcode
EN9 2EZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on flood risk
  • whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies

What decided it

The absence of a site-specific flood risk assessment to demonstrate that the development would not increase flood risk on the appeal site and in the surrounding area, contrary to Policy DM15 and the Framework.

The limited housing benefit from a single dwelling was outweighed by the strong reason for refusal provided by flood risk policies in the Framework, which displaced the presumption in favour of sustainable development despite the Council's failure to meet the Housing Delivery Test.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM15Policy DM16Policy DM18Policy DM17Policy DM21Policy SP5Policy DM4Policy SP6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 170Paragraph 176Paragraph 181

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

86 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  2. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266008699
    Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
  4. Dismissed23 October 20266013055
    Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
  5. Dismissed21 October 20266010759
    Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.