Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Jubilee Bungalow, Bournebridge Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Romford, RM4 1LT
Planning appeal 3347690 at Land Adjacent to Jubilee Bungalow, Bournebridge Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Romford, RM4 1LT (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 13 February 2025 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (the SAC) as a designated habitats site.
build two new 5-bedroom dwellings on the current vacant plot of land
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Szymanski D
- Postcode
- RM4 1LT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development upon the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (the SAC) as a designated habitats site
- whether or not the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed development upon Green Belt openness
- if the proposed development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development
What decided it
The failure to secure adequate mitigation for likely significant effects on the Epping Forest SAC through a binding planning obligation, combined with the development being inappropriate in the Green Belt and causing significant harm to openness, with no very special circumstances to justify the harm.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt and the harm to the integrity of the SAC, together with the regulatory precondition that the competent authority may only agree to a project after ascertaining it will not adversely affect the integrity of habitats sites, significantly outweigh the moderate benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits during construction, and potential improvements to character and appearance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM2Policy DM4Policy DM10(A)Policy DM22
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 99
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266008699Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
- Dismissed23 October 20266013055Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
- Dismissed21 October 20266010759Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®