Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 January 20253351473

Pavement Outside 65 - 75 West StreetBN1 2RA, Brighton, BN1 2RA

the installation of a ‘Pulse Smart Hub’ with integrated digital screens

Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Thomas M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and its amenity, including the setting of a listed building and whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Old Town Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal on the movement of pedestrians and other footway users (including those with restricted mobility and wheelchair users) and public safety

What decided it

The unacceptable heritage harm to the listed building setting and conservation area significance, combined with unacceptable harm to visual amenity and streetscene character, which were not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 215

Plan policies cited: CP12, CP13, CP15, CP9, DM20, DM24, DM25, DM26, DM29, DM33

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.