Planning appeal decision
Brighton Gasworks, Land Bounded by Roedean Road (B2066), Marina Way and Boundary Road, Brighton and Hove, BN2 5TG
Planning appeal 3353409 at Brighton Gasworks, Land Bounded by Roedean Road (B2066), Marina Way and Boundary Road, Brighton and Hove, BN2 5TG (Brighton and Hove City Council) was allowed on 11 June 2025 by Inspector Young D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Character and appearance.
Comprehensive mixed-use redevelopment comprising site preparation and enabling works, demolition of existing buildings and structures, provision of new buildings comprising residential use (C3) and flexible non-residential floorspace (E), amenity space, public realm, landscaping, parking, highway works, access and servicing arrangements and associated infrastructure, including interim works
- Authority
- Brighton and Hove City Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Unknown
- Inspector
- Young D
- Postcode
- BN2 5TG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Character and appearance
- Heritage Assets
- Living conditions
What decided it
The substantial benefits of redeveloping a brownfield site for much-needed homes and other identified needs, in a Council area lacking a five-year housing land supply, outweighed the limited heritage and amenity harms identified.
The substantial weight given to brownfield housing delivery and sustainable location, together with significant weight to townscape enhancement, biodiversity net gain, jobs and public realm, outweighed the great weight given to less than substantial heritage harm to the FCH and the limited weight given to harm to non-designated heritage assets and neighbouring living conditions, tipping the balance in favour of the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DA2Policy CP12Policy CP14Policy CP15Policy CP20Policy CP8Policy CP19Policy SS1Policy DM18Policy DM19Policy DM20Policy DM28Policy DM29Policy DM11Policy DM1Policy SA5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 33Paragraph 49Paragraph 57Paragraph 58Paragraph 61Paragraph 125Paragraph 130Paragraph 131Paragraph 139Paragraph 207Paragraph 208Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
- Judgments
- Jones v Mordue [2016] 1 W.L.R 2682; Catesby Estates Ltd. v Peter Steer v Historic England [2018] EWCA Civ 1697
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed26 October 20266014224East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
- Dismissed6 October 2026601154116 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
- Dismissed15 September 2026600726623-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
- Dismissed26 August 2026600958610 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
- Notice varied and upheld12 August 202633569778 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®