Planning appeal decision
Braeside, 28 Piercing Hill, Epping, Essex, CM16 7JW
Two-storey side and rear extensions, single storey extension and alterations to the roof to accommodate dormer windows and all other associated works
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Hickey A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on non-designated heritage assets with particular regard to Braeside, 28 Piercing Hill and Manor Villas
What decided it
The removal of the unsympathetic side extension, which is more harmful to the non-designated heritage assets, outweighs the limited harm from the internal reconfiguration, resulting in overall preservation of significance.
Framework references: 154, 15
Plan policies cited: Policy DM7, Policy DM9
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®