Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed17 June 20253353524

Braeside, 28 Piercing Hill, Epping, Essex, CM16 7JW

Two-storey side and rear extensions, single storey extension and alterations to the roof to accommodate dormer windows and all other associated works

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hickey A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on non-designated heritage assets with particular regard to Braeside, 28 Piercing Hill and Manor Villas

What decided it

The removal of the unsympathetic side extension, which is more harmful to the non-designated heritage assets, outweighs the limited harm from the internal reconfiguration, resulting in overall preservation of significance.

Framework references: 154, 15

Plan policies cited: Policy DM7, Policy DM9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.