Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 February 20253355254

14 Tycehurst Hill, LOUGHTON, IG10 1BU

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lancaster K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether Condition No.5 is reasonable, necessary and relevant to the development to achieve improvements in air quality
  • Whether Condition No.6 is reasonable, necessary and relevant to the development to improve the biodiversity of the site and to mitigate any impacts arising from the development
  • Whether Condition No.7 is reasonable, necessary and relevant to the development to protect the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers

What decided it

Condition 7 failed the test of reasonableness and necessity under the Framework and PPG as the Council did not provide clear justification for restricting permitted development rights beyond a general reference to design policy.

Framework references: 55, 57

Plan policies cited: Policy T1, Policy DM2, Policy DM22, Policy DM1, Policy DM9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.