Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 June 20253356149

47 Ainsworth Avenue, Ovingdean, East Sussex, BN2 7BG

Planning appeal 3356149 at 47 Ainsworth Avenue, Ovingdean, East Sussex, BN2 7BG (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 27 June 2025 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the proposed demolition of existing bungalow plus ancillary buildings (Class C3) and erection of 3no. three-bedroom dwellings (Class C3) (net increase of 2no. dwellings), plus parking provision, refuse storage, soft landscaping and ecological enhancements

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Goldberg V
Postcode
BN2 7BG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of 43 Ainsworth Avenue, with reference to privacy
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of 45 and 49 Ainsworth Avenue, with reference to outlook

What decided it

The material harm to character and appearance and the unacceptable impacts on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest housing delivery benefits, even applying the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.

The harm to character and appearance and living conditions of neighbours (afforded substantial weight) significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest contribution to housing supply (afforded modest weight) and limited sustainability and biodiversity benefits, such that the Framework does not indicate in favour of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP12Policy CP14Policy DM18Policy DM20
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 73
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [JPL, 1982, P37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

84 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed26 October 20266014224
    East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
  2. Dismissed6 October 20266011541
    16 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266007266
    23-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
  4. Dismissed26 August 20266009586
    10 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
  5. Notice varied and upheld12 August 20263356977
    8 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.