Planning appeal decision
Brooklyn Nursery, Mott Street, Sewardstone, Epping Forest, E4 7RW
Planning appeal 3356720 at Brooklyn Nursery, Mott Street, Sewardstone, Epping Forest, E4 7RW (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 7 July 2025 by Inspector Wallace J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to the risk of flooding.
demolition of existing glasshouses and erection of 2no. 4 bedroom chalet bungalows and 1no. 4 bedroom bungalow
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wallace J
- Postcode
- E4 7RW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to the risk of flooding
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
What decided it
The failure to carry out the sequential test and demonstrate that the proposed finished floor level would be sufficient to manage residual flood risk meant the site was not a suitable location for the development, engaging a strong reason for refusal under the Framework.
The benefits of three additional dwellings and economic benefits were outweighed by the unresolved flood risk concerns and the failure to apply the sequential test, with the flood risk policies providing a strong reason for refusal that displaced the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM15Policy DM4Policy DM4C(v)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 149Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 173Paragraph 181
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed29 October 2026601532055 Weald Hall Lane, Epping, CM16 6NB
- Dismissed28 October 20266011400Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
- Dismissed27 October 20266011962Russell Cottage,, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane,, Epping,, CM16 7PE
- Dismissed27 October 20266011961Russell Cottage, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane, Epping, CM16 7PE
- Allowed27 October 20266008413Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®