22 Costock Road, East Leake, Nottinghamshire, LE12 6LY

Planning appeal 3357481 at 22 Costock Road, East Leake, Nottinghamshire, LE12 6LY (Rushcliffe Borough Council) was allowed on 20 May 2026 by Inspector Pleasant L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a Certificate of Lawful Use or Development was well-founded, specifically whether the proposed garage falls within the curtilage of the dwellinghouse for the purposes of permitted development rights under Class E, Part 1, Schedule 2, GPDO 2015.

Detached garage within the curtilage of a dwellinghouse

Authority: Rushcliffe Borough Council
Appeal type: ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Pleasant L
Postcode: LE12 6LY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a Certificate of Lawful Use or Development was well-founded, specifically whether the proposed garage falls within the curtilage of the dwellinghouse for the purposes of permitted development rights under Class E, Part 1, Schedule 2, GPDO 2015

What decided it

The land where the garage would be sited is within the curtilage of the dwellinghouse because it is physically and functionally associated with the dwelling, serves as access, parking and garden area for the house, and has been in residential garden use for a number of years despite not being part of the original curtilage.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments: Dyer v Dorsett CC [1983] 3 WLR 231; McAlpine v SSE [1995] JPL B43; Burford v SSCLG & Test Valley BC [2017] 1493 (Admin); HM Attorney-General ex rel Sutcliffe & Rouse & Hughes v Calderdale BC [1983] JPL 310

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Rushcliffe

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

Dismissed6 October 20266002873
Land At Main Street, Flintham, NG23 5LA
Allowed2 October 20266010392
144 Browns Lane, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5BN
Dismissed27 August 20266010993
9 Birkin Avenue, Ruddington, Nottingham, NG11 6BJ
Dismissed11 August 20266010159
Land Field To The South Of Belvoir Vue, Sutton Lane, Granby, NG13 9PY
Dismissed2 July 20266004512
Garden Land to the Rear (North-East) of Olivants Cottage, Burton Lane, Whatton, NG13 9EQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.