Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 July 20253358063

2 E Flat Cottages , Hailey Lane, Hoddesdon, Hertford, SG13 7NY

Planning appeal 3358063 at 2 E Flat Cottages , Hailey Lane, Hoddesdon, Hertford, SG13 7NY (Broxbourne Borough Council) was dismissed on 10 July 2025 by Inspector Catcheside E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

demolition of existing garage and outbuildings and erection of single dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Catcheside E
Postcode
SG13 7NY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on protected trees
  • whether material considerations exist that are sufficient to outweigh any harm identified in respect of the above issues

What decided it

The absence of authoritative technical evidence regarding the location and extent of root protection areas of protected trees, combined with concerns about potential harm to the tree closest to the site, meant the harm to protected trees could not be ruled out and outweighed the material benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

81 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Broxbourne

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed12 October 20266008417
    Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, EN7 5EL
  2. Allowed10 June 20266003616
    Land at Goffs Oak Gospel Hall, East of Newgatestreet Road, Goffs Oak, EN7 5RU
  3. Dismissed4 November 20253366275
    Land to the West of Elm Farm Crouch Lane, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, Broxbourne, Hertfordshire, EN7 6TH
  4. Split Decision4 November 20253339195
    Flopsy Wood Community Project Cic, Cock Lane, Hoddesdon, EN11 8LS
  5. Allowed9 October 20253366662
    Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, EN7 5EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.