Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 June 20253358338

Olivedale, Bournebridge Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LT

Planning appeal 3358338 at Olivedale, Bournebridge Lane, Stapleford Abbotts, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LT (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 27 June 2025 by Inspector Sedgwick P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area; and the living conditions of occupiers of Brookside, with particular regard to privacy.

‘demolit ion of existing roof/first floor and construction of new pitched roof first New decking to the rear including privacy screens.’

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sedgwick P
Postcode
RM4 1LT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area; and the living conditions of occupiers of Brookside, with particular regard to privacy
  • whether the proposed development would lead to an unacceptable loss of adaptable housing, with regard to Development Plan policy

What decided it

The proposed development would conflict with Policy H1 by converting the bungalow into a two-storey dwelling, thereby causing an unacceptable loss of adaptable housing contrary to Development Plan policy.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM9Policy H1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

66 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 October 20266015320
    55 Weald Hall Lane, Epping, CM16 6NB
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266011962
    Russell Cottage,, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane,, Epping,, CM16 7PE
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266011961
    Russell Cottage, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane, Epping, CM16 7PE
  5. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.