Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 July 20253359642

101A Wolstenholme, Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, EN9 3AU

Planning appeal 3359642 at 101A Wolstenholme, Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, EN9 3AU (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 16 July 2025 by Inspector Nutman E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal constitutes good design and its effect on the character and appearance of the area.

a “proposal for a two-part double-storey front extension and skylights along the rear roof slope”

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Nutman E
Postcode
EN9 3AU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal constitutes good design and its effect on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposed front extension would appear excessively bulky and dominant by maintaining the existing ridge height, conflicting with Policy DM9 and NPPF chapter 12 requirements for good design that respects local character and distinctiveness.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

73 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 October 20266015320
    55 Weald Hall Lane, Epping, CM16 6NB
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266011962
    Russell Cottage,, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane,, Epping,, CM16 7PE
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266011961
    Russell Cottage, Coopersale Hall, Fluxs Lane, Epping, CM16 7PE
  5. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.