Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 July 20253359642

101A Wolstenholme, Honey Lane, Waltham Abbey, EN9 3AU

a “proposal for a two-part double-storey front extension and skylights along the rear roof slope”

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Nutman E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal constitutes good design and its effect on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposed front extension would appear excessively bulky and dominant by maintaining the existing ridge height, conflicting with Policy DM9 and NPPF chapter 12 requirements for good design that respects local character and distinctiveness.

Framework references: 12

Plan policies cited: Policy DM9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.