Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 July 20253361871

The Smiths Dock Inn, Skippers Lane , Normanby , TS6 0JF

Planning appeal 3361871 at The Smiths Dock Inn, Skippers Lane , Normanby , TS6 0JF (Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 July 2025 by Inspector Cowley R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would secure an adequate contribution towards the provision of affordable housing, with regard to the relevant provisions of the development plan.

outline application (some matters reserved) for residential development comprising 12 (no) dwellings and apartment block (16 apartments) (demolition of existing public house building)

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Cowley R
Postcode
TS6 0JF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would secure an adequate contribution towards the provision of affordable housing, with regard to the relevant provisions of the development plan
  • The effect of the proposal on the integrity of European sites, with particular regard to recreational disturbance and nutrient neutrality
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the grade II listed building known as the Smith's Dock Company War Memorial

What decided it

The failure to provide an executed s.106 legal agreement to secure affordable housing and the inability to demonstrate with sufficient certainty that the proposal would not adversely affect the integrity of the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar site due to incomplete evidence on nutrient neutrality mitigation.

The modest benefits of housing supply, reuse of previously developed land, and temporary economic boost during construction were insufficient to outweigh the identified harm and development plan conflict arising from the failure to secure affordable housing and the unresolved adverse effects on European site integrity.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H4Policy N4Policy SD4Policy HE2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Redcar and Cleveland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266014836
    10 Hauxley Close, Redcar, TS10 2QT
  2. Dismissed21 September 20266004752
    10 Dew Lane, Ormesby, Middlesbrough, TS7 9AR
  3. Dismissed28 August 20266011372
    40 Ings Road, Redcar, TS10 2DF
  4. Dismissed13 August 20266006441
    50 Garnet Street, Saltburn by the Sea, TS12 1EN
  5. Dismissed27 July 20266008827
    15 Mossdale Grove, Guisborough, TS14 8JB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.