Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 August 20253362307

11 - 13 Piccadilly, Manchester, M1 1LY

the change of use from A1 – shop to Sui Generis (A3/A5) – restaurant/take away to include the installation of external mounted equipment without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 107543/FO/2014/C2, dated 9 April 2015

Authority
Manchester City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Spataru A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect that varying the opening hours would have on crime and antisocial behaviour
  • the effect that varying the opening hours would have on regeneration of the area
  • the effect that varying the opening hours would have on the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to noise and activity

What decided it

The proposed extension of opening hours would exacerbate existing crime and antisocial behaviour issues in the area, contrary to the crime prevention aims of the development plan and NPPF paragraph 96.

Framework references: 96

Plan policies cited: Policy DM 1, Policy CC 1, Policy CC 4, Policy SP 1, Policy C 10, Policy DC10.1, Policy DC10.4, Policy DC26.1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.