Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of Birmingham Road, Hatton Park , Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 7DZ
Planning appeal 3362421 at Land to the South of Birmingham Road, Hatton Park , Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 7DZ (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 10 October 2025 by Inspector Parsons J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Warwick District Canal Conservation Area.
the erection of 3 storey 75 bed care home (Class C2) with associated landscaping and parking, and public footpath access to Hatton Locks and associated works
- Authority
- Warwick District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- community-institutional · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Parsons J
- Postcode
- CV35 7DZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Warwick District Canal Conservation Area
- whether the proposal would preserve the setting of a Grade II listed building, known as Lock House
- whether the proposal would offer accessibility to services and facilities by means of sustainable transport
- whether the proposal would require healthcare infrastructure provision
- whether the proposal would result in any 'less than substantial harm' in respect of the heritage assets and if it does, whether such harm would be outweighed by public benefits
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan and if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The less than substantial heritage harm to the Conservation Area and listed building setting, individually attracting considerable weight, would not be outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal, and combined with Green Belt harm, very special circumstances do not exist.
The significant benefits of care home provision, housing supply, health and social service savings, economic benefits, wellbeing improvements and a public footpath would weigh heavily in favour of the proposal, but would not outweigh the less than substantial heritage harm to the Conservation Area and listed building setting (each attracting considerable weight) and the harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness, such that very special circumstances do not exist and the proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BE1Policy HE1Policy H0Policy H1Policy H5Policy HS1Policy DS2Policy DS18Policy DM1Policy TR1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 61Paragraph 96Paragraph 109Paragraph 124Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 September 20266011601Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
- Dismissed23 September 20266006637Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
- Allowed27 July 20266004371South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR
- Allowed21 July 20266007706Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
- Allowed13 July 20266003642The Three Horseshoes, Spring Hill, Bubbenhall, CV8 3BD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®