Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 October 20253362421

Land to the South of Birmingham Road, Hatton Park , Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 7DZ

the erection of 3 storey 75 bed care home (Class C2) with associated landscaping and parking, and public footpath access to Hatton Locks and associated works

Authority
Warwick District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Parsons J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Warwick District Canal Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal would preserve the setting of a Grade II listed building, known as Lock House
  • whether the proposal would offer accessibility to services and facilities by means of sustainable transport
  • whether the proposal would require healthcare infrastructure provision
  • whether the proposal would result in any 'less than substantial harm' in respect of the heritage assets and if it does, whether such harm would be outweighed by public benefits
  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan and if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The less than substantial heritage harm to the Conservation Area and listed building setting, individually attracting considerable weight, would not be outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal, and combined with Green Belt harm, very special circumstances do not exist.

The significant benefits of care home provision, housing supply, health and social service savings, economic benefits, wellbeing improvements and a public footpath would weigh heavily in favour of the proposal, but would not outweigh the less than substantial heritage harm to the Conservation Area and listed building setting (each attracting considerable weight) and the harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness, such that very special circumstances do not exist and the proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 58, 61, 96, 109, 124, 135, 139, 142, 143, 154, 155, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy HE1, Policy H0, Policy H1, Policy H5, Policy HS1, Policy DS2, Policy DS18, Policy DM1, Policy TR1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.