Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 October 20253362421

Land to the South of Birmingham Road, Hatton Park , Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 7DZ

Planning appeal 3362421 at Land to the South of Birmingham Road, Hatton Park , Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 7DZ (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 10 October 2025 by Inspector Parsons J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Warwick District Canal Conservation Area.

the erection of 3 storey 75 bed care home (Class C2) with associated landscaping and parking, and public footpath access to Hatton Locks and associated works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Parsons J
Postcode
CV35 7DZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Warwick District Canal Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal would preserve the setting of a Grade II listed building, known as Lock House
  • whether the proposal would offer accessibility to services and facilities by means of sustainable transport
  • whether the proposal would require healthcare infrastructure provision
  • whether the proposal would result in any 'less than substantial harm' in respect of the heritage assets and if it does, whether such harm would be outweighed by public benefits
  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan and if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The less than substantial heritage harm to the Conservation Area and listed building setting, individually attracting considerable weight, would not be outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal, and combined with Green Belt harm, very special circumstances do not exist.

The significant benefits of care home provision, housing supply, health and social service savings, economic benefits, wellbeing improvements and a public footpath would weigh heavily in favour of the proposal, but would not outweigh the less than substantial heritage harm to the Conservation Area and listed building setting (each attracting considerable weight) and the harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness, such that very special circumstances do not exist and the proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BE1Policy HE1Policy H0Policy H1Policy H5Policy HS1Policy DS2Policy DS18Policy DM1Policy TR1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 61Paragraph 96Paragraph 109Paragraph 124Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

31 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Warwick

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011601
    Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
  2. Dismissed23 September 20266006637
    Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
  3. Allowed27 July 20266004371
    South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR
  4. Allowed21 July 20266007706
    Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
  5. Allowed13 July 20266003642
    The Three Horseshoes, Spring Hill, Bubbenhall, CV8 3BD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.