Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 September 20253363505

17 Marlborough Road, London, N22 8NB

Planning appeal 3363505 at 17 Marlborough Road, London, N22 8NB (London Borough of Haringey) was dismissed on 23 September 2025 by Inspector Cryan M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Bowes Park Conservation Area.

a two-storey, one-bedroom dwelling at the rear of 17 Marlborough Road, with access situated on Thorold Road, including infilling the lower ground floor with cavity wall insulation, tanking, and underpinning

Authority
London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cryan M
Postcode
N22 8NB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Bowes Park Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposed development on living conditions for neighbouring residents, with particular regard to daylight and sunlight, and whether it would be unacceptably overbearing

What decided it

The proposed development would cause less than substantial harm to the Bowes Park Conservation Area as a designated heritage asset, and this harm would not be outweighed by the limited public benefits of providing a single dwelling, contrary to Framework paragraph 215 and local plan policies requiring conservation and enhancement of heritage assets.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1Policy DM7Policy DM9Policy D3Policy HC1Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202Paragraph 213Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

525 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Haringey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266008251
    6 Ewart Grove, Wood Green, London, N22 5NX
  2. Allowed13 October 20266010745
    Rakkas 365-369 Green Lanes, Haringey, London, N4 1DY
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007195
    38 Parkhurst Road, Wood Green, London, N22 8JQ
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266011332
    5 Kimberley Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1LB
  5. Dismissed30 September 20263367051
    109 Great Cambridge Road, London, N17 7LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.