Planning appeal decision
114 Sunninghill Avenue, Hove, BN3 8JA
Planning appeal 3367324 at 114 Sunninghill Avenue, Hove, BN3 8JA (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 28 November 2025 by Inspector Dyer I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development provides suitable living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to the provision of external amenity space.
planning application to sub divide a dwellinghouse into two dwellings
- Authority
- Brighton and Hove City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Dyer I
- Postcode
- BN3 8JA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development provides suitable living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to the provision of external amenity space
- The effect of the development on the availability of family housing
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
What decided it
The creation of poor-quality living conditions with inadequate external amenity space and the harmful undermining of the area's character outweighed the benefits of delivering one additional dwelling in a location with significant housing land supply shortfall.
The benefits of housing delivery and use of brownfield land within the settlement were outweighed by the failure to achieve well-designed places that support health and wellbeing, with the importance of good design overpowering the provision of an extra windfall unit.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM1Policy DM3Policy DM18Policy DM21Policy DM22Policy CP12Policy CP14Policy CP19
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed26 October 20266014224East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
- Dismissed6 October 2026601154116 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
- Dismissed15 September 2026600726623-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
- Dismissed26 August 2026600958610 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
- Notice varied and upheld12 August 202633569778 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®