Planning appeal decision
Land at Church Lane, Martin Hussingtree, WR3 8TQ
Planning appeal 3368435 at Land at Church Lane, Martin Hussingtree, WR3 8TQ (Wychavon District Council) was dismissed on 8 December 2025 by Inspector Brennan P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, giving special regard to its effect on the Martin Hussingtree Conservation Area.
‘Erection of Self Build Live/Work Unit.’
- Authority
- Wychavon District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Brennan P
- Postcode
- WR3 8TQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, giving special regard to its effect on the Martin Hussingtree Conservation Area
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety with regard to safe access and egress
- whether adequate information has been submitted to assess the effect of the development on heritage assets
- whether the proposed live/work units are permitted under the terms of Part G of SWDP policy SWDP8 and would be supported by policy SWDP14 of the SWDPR
- whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to the provision of private amenity space
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and less than substantial but considerable harm to the conservation area, and the modest public benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm to constitute very special circumstances.
The modest benefits of housing delivery, employment use, and environmental improvements do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness, the considerable harm to the conservation area, and highway safety concerns, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the inappropriate development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- SWDP2SWDP4SWDP6SWDP8SWDP21SWDP24SWDP25SWDPR14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 207Paragraph 212
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wychavon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed17 September 20266008404Pinfield House, Brown Heath Lane, Martin Hussingtree, Droitwich, WR9 7JF
- Allowed23 March 20266001763Land At (Os 8785 6801) Kidderminster Road Cutnall Green, Worcester, WR9 0PW
- Dismissed27 February 20266001105Fanday, Brandheath Lane, New End, Redditch, B96 6NG
- Allowed2 February 20266001109Honeysuckle Cottage, 1 Whitlenge Lane, Hartlebury, DY10 4HD
- Dismissed21 January 20266000520Cedarroofs, Cutnall Green, Worcestershire, WR9 0NF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®