Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 December 20253368435

Land at Church Lane, Martin Hussingtree, WR3 8TQ

Planning appeal 3368435 at Land at Church Lane, Martin Hussingtree, WR3 8TQ (Wychavon District Council) was dismissed on 8 December 2025 by Inspector Brennan P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, giving special regard to its effect on the Martin Hussingtree Conservation Area.

‘Erection of Self Build Live/Work Unit.’

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Brennan P
Postcode
WR3 8TQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, giving special regard to its effect on the Martin Hussingtree Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety with regard to safe access and egress
  • whether adequate information has been submitted to assess the effect of the development on heritage assets
  • whether the proposed live/work units are permitted under the terms of Part G of SWDP policy SWDP8 and would be supported by policy SWDP14 of the SWDPR
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to the provision of private amenity space
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness and less than substantial but considerable harm to the conservation area, and the modest public benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm to constitute very special circumstances.

The modest benefits of housing delivery, employment use, and environmental improvements do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness, the considerable harm to the conservation area, and highway safety concerns, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the inappropriate development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SWDP2SWDP4SWDP6SWDP8SWDP21SWDP24SWDP25SWDPR14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 207Paragraph 212

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wychavon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed17 September 20266008404
    Pinfield House, Brown Heath Lane, Martin Hussingtree, Droitwich, WR9 7JF
  2. Allowed23 March 20266001763
    Land At (Os 8785 6801) Kidderminster Road Cutnall Green, Worcester, WR9 0PW
  3. Dismissed27 February 20266001105
    Fanday, Brandheath Lane, New End, Redditch, B96 6NG
  4. Allowed2 February 20266001109
    Honeysuckle Cottage, 1 Whitlenge Lane, Hartlebury, DY10 4HD
  5. Dismissed21 January 20266000520
    Cedarroofs, Cutnall Green, Worcestershire, WR9 0NF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.