Planning appeal decision
Cedarroofs, Cutnall Green, Worcestershire, WR9 0NF
Planning appeal 6000520 at Cedarroofs, Cutnall Green, Worcestershire, WR9 0NF (Wychavon District Council) was dismissed on 21 January 2026 by Inspector Astley-Serougi B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt including its effect on openness and the purposes of including land within it, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
proposed new dwelling
- Authority
- Wychavon District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Astley-Serougi B
- Postcode
- WR9 0NF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt including its effect on openness and the purposes of including land within it, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development
- whether the proposed development provides an adequate contribution to affordable housing
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with the unsustainable location and failure to secure affordable housing contributions, is not clearly outweighed by the benefit of one dwelling, particularly where the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply due to Green Belt considerations.
The moderate weight given to housing delivery (one dwelling against a 1.1-year supply) does not clearly outweigh the substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt, the moderate harm to visual openness, the unsuitability of the location, and the absence of an adequate affordable housing contribution; the balance tipped decisively against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SWDP1Policy SWDP2Policy SWDP4Policy SWDP15Policy SWDP22Policy SWDP27
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wychavon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed17 September 20266008404Pinfield House, Brown Heath Lane, Martin Hussingtree, Droitwich, WR9 7JF
- Allowed23 March 20266001763Land At (Os 8785 6801) Kidderminster Road Cutnall Green, Worcester, WR9 0PW
- Dismissed27 February 20266001105Fanday, Brandheath Lane, New End, Redditch, B96 6NG
- Allowed2 February 20266001109Honeysuckle Cottage, 1 Whitlenge Lane, Hartlebury, DY10 4HD
- Dismissed8 December 20253368435Land at Church Lane, Martin Hussingtree, WR3 8TQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®