Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 February 20266001105

Fanday, Brandheath Lane, New End, Redditch, B96 6NG

Planning appeal 6001105 at Fanday, Brandheath Lane, New End, Redditch, B96 6NG (Wychavon District Council) was dismissed on 27 February 2026 by Inspector Parton T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the location, land use, and the amount of development proposed are appropriate at this site, with particular regard to the level of accessibility.

Permission in principle for proposed residential development of up to nine dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Parton T
Postcode
B96 6NG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the location, land use, and the amount of development proposed are appropriate at this site, with particular regard to the level of accessibility
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether or not very special circumstances exist for development in the Green Belt

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, and this harm is not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery in an area with a shortfall in supply.

The substantial benefits of housing delivery in an area with only 1.1 years of housing land supply were outweighed by the substantial harms to the Green Belt (inappropriateness and loss of openness), conflicts with the spatial strategy and sustainability requirements, and harm to character and appearance, with the Green Belt protection providing a clear reason for refusal under NPPF paragraph 11d)i).

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SWDP1Policy SWDP2Policy SWDP4Policy SWDP21Policy SWDP25
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 85Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wychavon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed17 September 20266008404
    Pinfield House, Brown Heath Lane, Martin Hussingtree, Droitwich, WR9 7JF
  2. Allowed23 March 20266001763
    Land At (Os 8785 6801) Kidderminster Road Cutnall Green, Worcester, WR9 0PW
  3. Allowed2 February 20266001109
    Honeysuckle Cottage, 1 Whitlenge Lane, Hartlebury, DY10 4HD
  4. Dismissed21 January 20266000520
    Cedarroofs, Cutnall Green, Worcestershire, WR9 0NF
  5. Dismissed8 December 20253368435
    Land at Church Lane, Martin Hussingtree, WR3 8TQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.