Planning appeal decision
5-7 Bedford Road, Wilstead, Bedford, MK45 3HN
Planning appeal 3369495 at 5-7 Bedford Road, Wilstead, Bedford, MK45 3HN (Bedford Borough Council) was dismissed on 10 December 2025 by Inspector Marriott H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and whether or not the significance of the settings of the Grade II listed buildings known as 5 and 7 Bedford Road (No 5-7), Winters Moon and 8 Church Road would be preserved.
for the construction of 3 no. 3-bed accessible bungalows with associated landscaping, parking and refuse storage
- Authority
- Bedford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Marriott H
- Postcode
- MK45 3HN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and whether or not the significance of the settings of the Grade II listed buildings known as 5 and 7 Bedford Road (No 5-7), Winters Moon and 8 Church Road would be preserved
- whether or not suitable living conditions would be provided for occupiers of the proposed development with particular regard to outlook, outdoor amenity space provision and waste collection
- the suitability of the proposed access arrangement for road users
- the effect of the proposed development on archaeology
- the effect of the proposed development on ecology with particular regard to protected species
- whether or not the proposed development would meet the tree planting requirements of the development plan
What decided it
The moderate and low levels of less than substantial harm to the significance of the settings of the three listed buildings, to which great weight must be given under the Framework, outweighs the modest public benefits of housing delivery and cannot be justified by enabling development arguments.
The moderate weight attributed to public benefits (housing delivery, accessible dwellings, economic benefits and community vitality) does not outweigh the significant policy conflicts identified across heritage, living conditions, access, archaeology, protected species and tree planting, which together weigh to a very substantial extent against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 28SPolicy 29Policy 30Policy 31Policy 36SPolicy 41SPolicy 42SPolicy 3SPolicy 7SPolicy BE1Policy BE2Policy NE1Policy RC1Policy TT1Policy TT3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 207Paragraph 215Paragraph 219Paragraph 221
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bedford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed14 September 20266011253Land Adjacent 8 Bedford Road, Cople, Bedford, MK44 3TP
- Allowed24 July 20266004689Land North of Hall End Road, Wootton, MK43 9HP
- Allowed16 February 2026337598425 Top End, Renhold, Bedford, MK41 0LR
- Dismissed6 November 20253367211Hill Farm Barn, Water Lane, Renhold, Bedfordshire, MK41 0JH
- Allowed2 July 20253357192Land at Bedford Road and High Street , Roxton , Bedfordshire
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®