Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 October 20253369927

The Roses Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD

Planning appeal 3369927 at The Roses Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 24 October 2025 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, in particular whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area.

the demolition of all buildings, replacement of car body repair yard, scrap yard, car dealership, haulage company, electrical repair company and 1no. dwelling and the erection of 10no. dwellings

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Sylvester G
Postcode
CM19 5DD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, in particular whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area
  • Whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework, and its effect on Green Belt openness
  • The effect of the proposed development on the safety of highway users
  • Whether the proposed development would be in an appropriate location for the appeal scheme with particular regard to access to services and facilities
  • Whether satisfactory living conditions would be provided for the future occupants of proposed plots 1, 2, 3 and 10 with particular regard to the size and quality of gardens
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the nearby property referred to as 'Allengale' with particular regard to outlook and privacy

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the conservation area as a designated heritage asset, which is a matter of considerable importance and great weight, and the development's failure to be well-designed, together with the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness, were determinative in refusing the appeal.

The substantial cumulative public benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits, biodiversity enhancement and reduced vehicle emissions did not outweigh the harm to the conservation area (a matter of considerable importance and great weight) and the substantial harm to the Green Belt by inappropriateness and loss of openness; the tilted balance did not apply due to the strong reason for refusal provided by heritage protection.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP6Policy DM3Policy DM4Policy DM7Policy DM9Policy DM10Policy T1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 207

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

63 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epping Forest District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266011400
    Larksmead Nursery, St Leonards Road, Nazeing, EN9 2HQ
  2. Allowed27 October 20266008413
    Sparks Farm, Nine Ashes Road, Nine Ashes, CM4 0JZ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266008699
    Denver Lodge, Waltham Road, Nazeing, EN9 2EB
  4. Dismissed23 October 20266013055
    Millers Farm, Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, CM19 5DD
  5. Dismissed21 October 20266010759
    Spains Hall, Spains Hall Road, Willingale, Ongar, CM5 0QE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.