Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 November 20253370700

1 Mayo Road, Brighton, BN2 3RJ

Planning appeal 3370700 at 1 Mayo Road, Brighton, BN2 3RJ (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 10 November 2025 by Inspector Heppell J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Round Hill Conservation Area.

reconfiguration of rear extension and erection of new house to side of existing house

Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Heppell J
Postcode
BN2 3RJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Round Hill Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would result in a high degree of less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Round Hill Conservation Area through loss of architectural detailing and disruption of the street frontage, which could not be outweighed by the moderate benefits of delivering a single dwelling.

The harm to a designated heritage asset of particular importance provided a strong reason for refusing permission under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, and the moderate positive weight attached to the social and economic benefits of one dwelling did not outweigh the considerable importance and weight given to the less than substantial harm to the conservation area's significance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP12CP15DM18DM26
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 208Paragraph 215Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

535 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed26 October 20266014224
    East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
  2. Dismissed6 October 20266011541
    16 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266007266
    23-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
  4. Dismissed26 August 20266009586
    10 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
  5. Notice varied and upheld12 August 20263356977
    8 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.