Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 November 20253370854

30 Upper North Street, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3FG

Planning appeal 3370854 at 30 Upper North Street, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3FG (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 14 November 2025 by Inspector Burley P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal scheme would support mixed and balanced communities.

the change of use from residential flat (C3) and shop (E) to 6no bedroom small house in multiple occupation (C4) including new doors, rear lightwell and associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Burley P
Postcode
BN1 3FG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal scheme would support mixed and balanced communities
  • Whether the appeal scheme would provide acceptable living conditions for the occupiers of the proposed development with regard to communal space

What decided it

The poor quality and limited usability of the proposed communal space, combined with the creation of a continuous frontage of three HMOs, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits in circumstances of housing land supply shortfall.

The limited additional housing contribution (moderate positive weight) was outweighed by the significant adverse impacts on living conditions and mixed and balanced communities, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM7Policy DM1Policy DM20
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

546 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed26 October 20266014224
    East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
  2. Dismissed6 October 20266011541
    16 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266007266
    23-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
  4. Dismissed26 August 20266009586
    10 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
  5. Notice varied and upheld12 August 20263356977
    8 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.