Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 June 20263372041

35 Robbins Close, Bradley Stoke, Bristol, South Gloucestershire, BS328AS

Planning appeal 3372041 at 35 Robbins Close, Bradley Stoke, Bristol, South Gloucestershire, BS328AS (South Gloucestershire Council) was dismissed on 15 June 2026 by Inspector Law T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and host building.

two sided car port to be placed in front garden

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Law T
Postcode
BS32 8AS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and host building
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of No.35 Robbins Close, with particular regard to light
  • The impact on highway safety, with particular regard to parking provision

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area, harm the living conditions of the occupants through loss of daylight and outlook, and compromise highway safety through reduced parking provision.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1 of the South Gloucestershire Local Plan Core Strategy (2006-2027)Policy PSP1 of South Gloucestershire Local Plan Policies, Sites and Places Plan (November 2017)Policy PSP38 of South Gloucestershire Local Plan Policies, Sites and Places Plan (November 2017)Policy PSP8 of South Gloucestershire Local Plan Policies, Sites and Places Plan (November 2017)Policy PSP16 of South Gloucestershire Local Plan Policies, Sites and Places Plan (November 2017)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

34 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed25 August 20266009167
    27 Gloucester Road North, Filton, BS7 0SQ
  2. Allowed9 July 20266008703
    Land at 42 Teewell Hill, Staple Hill, Bristol, BS16 5PD
  3. Dismissed29 June 20266007248
    14 Hawthorn Avenue, Bristol, BS15 3ES
  4. Dismissed23 June 20266003830
    65-67 Gloucester Road, Patchway, BS34 5JH
  5. Dismissed19 June 20266005954
    92 Bradley Road, Patchway, BS34 5HS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.