Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 June 20266003830

65-67 Gloucester Road, Patchway, BS34 5JH

Planning appeal 6003830 at 65-67 Gloucester Road, Patchway, BS34 5JH (South Gloucestershire Council) was dismissed on 23 June 2026 by Inspector AJ Sutton, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, having regard to outlook.

Alterations to front elevation and other works to facilitate change of use of existing commercial units to 2 no. small HMOs (Use Class C4)

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
AJ Sutton
Postcode
BS34 5JH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, having regard to outlook
  • The effect of the proposal on the character of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety in the area, having regard to parking provision

What decided it

The substantial adverse impact regarding poor living conditions for future occupants, particularly bedroom 2's gloomy and confined outlook, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the considerable benefits of housing delivery and brownfield reuse.

The benefits of housing delivery, windfall development, brownfield reuse, and good public transport access were outweighed by the substantial harm to living conditions for future occupants and poor design standards.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PSP8Policy CS1Policy PSP1Policy CS8Policy PSP16Policy PSP39Policy CS13Policy CS25Policy CS14Policy PSP31Policy PSP32
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

55 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed25 August 20266009167
    27 Gloucester Road North, Filton, BS7 0SQ
  2. Allowed9 July 20266008703
    Land at 42 Teewell Hill, Staple Hill, Bristol, BS16 5PD
  3. Dismissed29 June 20266007248
    14 Hawthorn Avenue, Bristol, BS15 3ES
  4. Dismissed19 June 20266005954
    92 Bradley Road, Patchway, BS34 5HS
  5. Dismissed15 June 20263372041
    35 Robbins Close, Bradley Stoke, Bristol, South Gloucestershire, BS328AS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.