Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed8 December 20256000158

Corner Farm Cottage, Fen Lane, North Ockendon, RM14 3RB

Planning appeal 6000158 at Corner Farm Cottage, Fen Lane, North Ockendon, RM14 3RB (London Borough of Havering) was allowed on 8 December 2025 by Inspector Fish A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, including an assessment of the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.

demolition of existing buildings and extensions and construction of double storey side extension, new raised roof, internal reconfiguration and material changes to elevation

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Fish A
Postcode
RM14 3RB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, including an assessment of the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt

What decided it

The demolition of existing structures reducing the spread of buildings across the site, combined with the flat landscape topography heightening openness, meant the proposal would not cause substantial harm to Green Belt openness under NPPF paragraph 154 g).

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy G2 of The London Plan adopted March 2021
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld25 June 20263358682
    Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
  2. Split Decision23 June 20263377437
    Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD
  3. Split Decision23 June 20263377383
    Noak Hill, Romford, RM4 1LD
  4. Allowed10 April 20266001332
    Bush Farm Back Lakes, Aveley Road, Upminster, RM14 2TQ
  5. Allowed26 February 20266001099
    Havering Park Stables, Bower Farm Road, Havering-Atte-Bower, Romford, Greater London, RM4 1QR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.