Planning appeal decision
Suttons Farm, Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
Planning appeal 6000225 at Suttons Farm, Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 29 September 2025 by Inspector Wright A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.
the demolition of the existing structure and outbuilding and the erection of four new dwellings, and all associated works including parking and landscaping
- Authority
- London Borough of Havering
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wright A
- Postcode
- RM14 1TP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to outlook and access
- whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing
- the effect of the proposed development on protected species, with particular regard to bats and great crested newts
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the failure to demonstrate very special circumstances that would clearly outweigh this harm and the other identified harms to character, living conditions and affordable housing provision.
The modest weight given to housing delivery and limited weight to biodiversity net gain did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, harm to character and appearance, unacceptable living conditions, and failure to provide affordable housing; the Green Belt protection policies provided a strong reason to refuse the development notwithstanding the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2 of the London Plan 2021Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021Policy 3 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 4 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 10 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 27 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy G7 of the London Plan 2021
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Havering
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Notice upheld25 June 20263358682Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
- Split Decision23 June 20263377437Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD
- Split Decision23 June 20263377383Noak Hill, Romford, RM4 1LD
- Allowed10 April 20266001332Bush Farm Back Lakes, Aveley Road, Upminster, RM14 2TQ
- Allowed26 February 20266001099Havering Park Stables, Bower Farm Road, Havering-Atte-Bower, Romford, Greater London, RM4 1QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®