Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 September 20256000225

Suttons Farm, Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP

Planning appeal 6000225 at Suttons Farm, Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 29 September 2025 by Inspector Wright A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

the demolition of the existing structure and outbuilding and the erection of four new dwellings, and all associated works including parking and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wright A
Postcode
RM14 1TP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to outlook and access
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing
  • the effect of the proposed development on protected species, with particular regard to bats and great crested newts
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the failure to demonstrate very special circumstances that would clearly outweigh this harm and the other identified harms to character, living conditions and affordable housing provision.

The modest weight given to housing delivery and limited weight to biodiversity net gain did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, harm to character and appearance, unacceptable living conditions, and failure to provide affordable housing; the Green Belt protection policies provided a strong reason to refuse the development notwithstanding the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy G2 of the London Plan 2021Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021Policy 3 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 4 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 10 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 27 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy G7 of the London Plan 2021
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

72 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld25 June 20263358682
    Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
  2. Split Decision23 June 20263377437
    Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD
  3. Split Decision23 June 20263377383
    Noak Hill, Romford, RM4 1LD
  4. Allowed10 April 20266001332
    Bush Farm Back Lakes, Aveley Road, Upminster, RM14 2TQ
  5. Allowed26 February 20266001099
    Havering Park Stables, Bower Farm Road, Havering-Atte-Bower, Romford, Greater London, RM4 1QR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.