Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 December 20256000243

Kings Oak, Clay Tye Road, Upminster, Havering, RM14 3PL

side/rear extension and proposed garage conversion

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Fish A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the extension constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • Its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Its effect on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider area
  • If it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The extension constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with disproportionate additions over and above the size of the original building, and the harm to the Green Belt is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 154, 153

Plan policies cited: Policy G2 of The London Plan adopted March 2021, Policy D4 of The London Plan, Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.